Case 3202050/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Matthews v Homerton University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust — 2019
- Case reference
- 3202050/2018
- Decision date
- 18 May 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Russell Representation
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Matthews
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal refused the claimant's application to amend his claim so as to include a constructive dismissal complaint and three further allegations of disability discrimination. The written judgment records the refusal only and does not set out any substantive findings on the proposed claims.
The tribunal also refused the respondent's application for the costs of the hearing. No monetary award was made in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The tribunal refused the claimant's application to amend his claim to add constructive dismissal. The judgment does not determine the merits of any underlying constructive dismissal complaint. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal refused the claimant's application to amend his claim to add three further allegations of disability discrimination. The judgment does not determine the merits of any underlying discrimination complaint. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.