Case 3202131/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Greer v London Underground Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 3202131/2020
- Decision date
- 23 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge John Crosfill
- Panel members
- Ms M Long, Mr ML Wood
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Greer
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Claimant withdrew his direct discrimination claims because of age and race, and those claims were dismissed upon withdrawal. His unfair dismissal claim under Part X of the Employment Rights Act 1996 was found to be well founded.
For remedy, the Tribunal reduced the basic award by 70% to reflect conduct by the Claimant that caused or contributed to his dismissal. The parties agreed that the resulting basic award was £4,438.00, and the Respondent was ordered to pay that sum.
The Tribunal made no compensatory award because it found that, had the Respondent acted lawfully, it could and would have dismissed the Claimant at the same point. The notice pay claim brought as a breach of contract claim was dismissed, and the recoupment regulations did not apply.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | The judgment states that the direct discrimination claim because of age was dismissed upon withdrawal by the Claimant. | Withdrawn | Age | — |
| Race discrimination | The judgment states that the direct discrimination claim because of race was dismissed upon withdrawal by the Claimant. | Withdrawn | Race | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The claim under Part X of the Employment Rights Act 1996 was found to be well founded. The only monetary award was the agreed basic award of £4,438.00. | Upheld | — | £4,438 |
| Breach of contract | The notice pay claim brought as a breach of contract claim under the Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England and Wales) Order 1994 was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,438
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £4,438
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £0
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
3 references- Part X of the Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 123(6) of the Employment Rights Act 1996
- Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England and Wales) Order 1994
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.