Case 3202308/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms C. Southgate v Toni & Guy (Romford) Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 3202308/2019
- Decision date
- 5 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Massarella Members
- Panel members
- Mrs G. Forrest, Mr D. Ross
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms C. Southgate
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs C Southgate, a gay apprentice hairdresser, brought claims arising from her employment at the Romford salon from 13 November 2018. Before the hearing she withdrew her claims for holiday pay/expenses and notice pay, and those claims were dismissed on withdrawal. The remaining claims were for direct discrimination and harassment related to sexual orientation.
The tribunal rejected the harassment allegations. It did not accept that Ms Scaddan pressured the Claimant to come out, made the alleged comments about her clothes, laughed at her in the way alleged, or said that her mannerisms showed she was gay. The tribunal found the Claimant's evidence inconsistent and vague on important points, and it accepted Ms Scaddan's evidence that she kept the Claimant's sexuality confidential and behaved supportively when the Claimant confided in her.
The direct discrimination allegations also failed. The tribunal found that Ms Cowlbeck did not know the Claimant was gay until these proceedings were issued, so criticism about models, the till incident, the discussion about whether hairdressing was the right career, and the decision to end the apprenticeship could not have been because of sexual orientation. Where the tribunal accepted that the Claimant had made a refund error and that Ms Cowlbeck later lost confidence in her progress, it found those matters were linked to the mistake and concerns about commitment, not to sexual orientation.
No monetary award was made. The tribunal added that, although no unfair dismissal claim was before it, it would have had serious concerns about the fairness of the dismissal if such a claim had been made.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Holiday pay and expenses; dismissed on withdrawal before any substantive determination. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay; dismissed on withdrawal before any substantive determination. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Harassment | Harassment related to sexual orientation. The tribunal found allegations 2.2 to 2.5, and the harassment limb of 1.1(A), were not proved and were not well-founded. | Dismissed | Sexual orientation | — |
| Sexual orientation discrimination | Direct discrimination because of sexual orientation. The tribunal found allegations 1.1 to 1.5 did not establish that the complained-of treatment occurred or, where it did occur, that sexual orientation played any part in it. | Dismissed | Sexual orientation | — |
Legal tests applied
10 references- s.13 Equality Act 2010
- s.136 Equality Act 2010
- Hewage v Grampian Health Board
- Nagarajan v London Regional Transport
- Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police v Khan
- Reynolds v CLFIS (UK) Ltd
- Shamoon v Chief Constable of the Royal Ulster Constabulary
- s.26 Equality Act 2010
- Richmond Pharmacology v Dhaliwal
- Land Registry v Grant
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.