Case 3202513/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms U. Jama v Barking Havering & Redbridge University Hospital NHS Trust and 1 other — 2023
- Case reference
- 3202513/2020
- Decision date
- 12 September 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Massarella Members
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
- Panel members
- Mrs B.K. Saund, Mr J. Webb
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Ms U. Jama
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn the liability judgment sent on 24 February 2023, Ms Jama succeeded against the First Respondent in 11 claims of direct race discrimination, 5 claims of harassment related to race, 7 claims of victimisation, and 8 claims of whistleblowing detriment. Her victimisation claim J-VICT11 also succeeded against Ms C. Beck; all other claims against her were dismissed. The tribunal said the remaining claims were not well-founded or were excluded by operation of s.212(1) EqA.
In the remedy judgment sent on 12 September 2023, the tribunal accepted that the cumulative discrimination caused Ms Jama to take sick leave from 3 August 2020 to 19 October 2020, to stop working on-call shifts from August 2020, and later to take Wednesdays off because of stress and therapy. It awarded the full amount of her on-call losses and the full amount of the Wednesday losses, and it applied a 20% uplift on non-financial losses and a 15% uplift on financial losses, with interest running from 26 October 2021 once the net figures were agreed.
That remedy judgment awarded £29,000 for injury to feelings, £5,000 aggravated damages, £6,000 personal injury, £8,000 by way of ACAS uplift and £10,632.06 interest, producing a total of £58,632.06 under those heads, with the Second Respondent jointly and severally liable for £5,000 of the injury-to-feelings award. The tribunal also recommended that the Trust arrange for Ms Jama to attend the Roche CITM administration course within six months because the failure to consider her for that training in January 2020 was direct race discrimination. The later consent order dated 5 January 2024 recorded a net payment of £47,857.37 and a grossed-up total of £88,196.24 for the awards in paragraphs 6 and 7 of the remedy judgment, and ordered pension contributions of £378.25 employee and £739.72 employer in respect of £3,590.85 gross awards.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | 11 claims succeeded against the First Respondent. | Upheld | Race | — |
| Harassment | 5 claims of harassment related to race succeeded against the First Respondent. | Upheld | Race | — |
| Victimisation | 7 claims succeeded against the First Respondent, and J-VICT11 also succeeded against Ms C. Beck. | Upheld | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | 8 whistleblowing detriment claims succeeded against the First Respondent. | Upheld | — | — |
| Other | All other claims were dismissed or excluded by operation of s.212(1) EqA, including the remaining claims against Ms C. Beck. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £88,196
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £47,857
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
7 references- s.136 EqA burden of proof
- Shamoon detriment test
- s.26 EqA harassment
- s.27 EqA victimisation
- s.47B ERA 1996
- Fecitt v NHS Manchester
- s.212(1) EqA
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.