Case 3202541/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms L. Magdalina v UC Franchising Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 3202541/2019
- Decision date
- 6 August 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Massarella Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms L. Magdalina
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal recorded that by letter dated 2 July 2020 it had given the Claimant an opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out for failure to actively pursue it. The letter set out the reasons for that proposed course.
The Claimant did not make written representations in response. On that basis, the Tribunal struck out the claim.
The extracted judgment does not record any substantive determination of liability, any hearing on the merits, or any monetary award. It is a short case-management judgment ending with the strike out decision issued by Employment Judge Massarella on 6 August 2020.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The extracted judgment text does not specify the substantive claim type, but the gov.uk listing for this case identifies it as an unlawful deduction from wages / written pay statement matter. The judgment itself only states that 'the claim' was struck out because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.