Case 3202590/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Scott Green Mr Niel Fairweather Mr Jake Mitchell Mr Tim Savage Mr Kevin Hillier Mr Amir Ayerman Mr Matthew Tolson Mr Richard Wellingbrook Mr Lee Henderson Mr Josh Rose Mr Gheorge Filip Mr Bogdan Tita Mr Paul Penney Mr Shervon Desir Mr Radu Arsin v PMC Soil Solutions Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 3202590/2019
- Decision date
- 27 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Russell Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Scott Green Mr Niel Fairweather Mr Jake Mitchell Mr Tim Savage Mr Kevin Hillier Mr Amir Ayerman Mr Matthew Tolson Mr Richard Wellingbrook Mr Lee Henderson Mr Josh Rose Mr Gheorge Filip Mr Bogdan Tita Mr Paul Penney Mr Shervon Desir Mr Radu Arsin
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that PMC Soil Solutions Limited failed to comply with its obligations under sections 188 and 188A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. This was a Rule 21 judgment, and the decision was made in favour of the listed claimants.
Pursuant to section 189 of the 1992 Act, the tribunal ordered a protective award for each claimant for a period of 90 days commencing on 1 July 2019. The judgment also recorded that the hearing listed for 16 and 17 April 2020 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trade union | Rule 21 judgment. The tribunal found the respondent failed to comply with its obligations under s.188 and s.188A TULRCA 1992 and made a protective award under s.189. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- s.188 TULRCA 1992
- s.188A TULRCA 1992
- s.189 TULRCA 1992
- Rule 21
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.