Case 3202626/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Ms D Falusi v London Borough of Newham and 1 other — 2020
- Case reference
- 3202626/2019
- Decision date
- 21 May 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lewis Date
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Ms D Falusi
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment recorded that the Claimant withdrew the claim for direct discrimination contrary to section 13 of the Equality Act. That claim was dismissed on withdrawal.
The claim of sexual harassment contrary to section 26 of the Equality Act 2010 was not determined in this judgment. Employment Judge Lewis recorded that it would proceed to a hearing on 17, 18 and 19 March 2021.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex discrimination | The judgment states that the claim for direct discrimination contrary to section 13 of the Equality Act was dismissed on withdrawal by the Claimant. The protected characteristic is inferred from the sex discrimination listing and the remaining sexual harassment claim. | Withdrawn | Sex | — |
| Harassment | The judgment states that the claim of sexual harassment contrary to section 26 of the Equality Act 2010 would proceed to a hearing on 17, 18 and 19 March 2021; it was not finally determined in this judgment. | Other | Sex | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 13 of the Equality Act
- section 26 of the Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.