Case 3202884/2022 · Employment Tribunal
A Al-Amin v Becave Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 3202884/2022
- Decision date
- 9 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge O’Brien Representation
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
A Al-Amin
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge O’Brien heard the case at East London Hearing Centre on 9 December 2022. The respondent did not attend and was not represented. The judgment records that the claimant was awarded damages for breach of contract in the sums of £2,893.36 gross for unpaid wages, £289.34 as a 10% contractual uplift for late payment of wages, and £271.26 for notice pay.
The tribunal also awarded £424.97 in respect of accrued but untaken holiday at the date of termination. The judgment states that the above sums total £3,878.93 and are to be paid within 14 days of the date of judgment. No separate legal test is cited in the extracted text, and the judgment gives only the brief award reasons recorded above.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment describes this award as damages for breach of contract. It comprises unpaid wages of £2,893.36 gross, a contractual late-payment uplift of £289.34, and notice pay of £271.26. | Upheld | — | £3,454 |
| Holiday pay | Awarded as compensation in respect of accrued but untaken holiday at the date of termination. | Upheld | — | £425 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,879
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.