Case 3203035/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T Simpson v Burberry Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 3203035/2019
- Decision date
- 9 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge McLaren Representation
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T Simpson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 2 July 2020 before Employment Judge McLaren, the tribunal dismissed the claimant's race discrimination claim insofar as it related to alleged failures to promote in April 2017, June 2017 and May 2018. The tribunal found that that claim had been presented outside the appropriate time limit.
The tribunal also held that it was not just and equitable to extend time in all the circumstances of the case. No remedy was awarded on this claim.
The judgment records that the claimant's unfair dismissal claim, race discrimination claim arising from dismissal, and breach of contract claim for failure to pay notice pay continued.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The claim for race discrimination arising from failure to promote the claimant in April 2017, June 2017 and May 2018 was dismissed because it was brought outside the appropriate time limit and it was not just and equitable to extend time in all the circumstances. | Dismissed | Race | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.