Case 3203852/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Jevstafjevs v Monolith (UK) Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 3203852/2022
- Decision date
- 6 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge C Lewis Appearances
- Venue
- East London
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Jevstafjevs
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal considered two preliminary complaints at East London Employment Tribunal on 3 November 2023. In claim 3203852/2022, Mr A Jevstafjevs alleged unfair dismissal. The tribunal found that he had been employed by Monolith (UK) Ltd for less than two years, so he was not entitled to bring an unfair dismissal complaint under section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. He did not give an acceptable reason, despite being given the opportunity, why the complaint should not be struck out, and the unfair dismissal complaint was struck out.
In claim 3204308/2022, the claimant alleged disability discrimination. The tribunal accepted that he had provided medical evidence showing a back injury and associated pain between 4 January 2022 and 22 June 2022, when he completed rehabilitation, but found that this was a period of just under six months. He confirmed that he had no further evidence to show the impairment was long-term, and the tribunal was satisfied that it did not meet the Equality Act 2010 definition of disability because it had not lasted, and was not likely to last, 12 months.
The tribunal held that there was no reasonable prospect of the claimant establishing that he was a disabled person for the purposes of the Equality Act 2010. He again did not give an acceptable reason why the complaint should not be struck out. The disability discrimination claim was therefore struck out, and claim number 3204308/2022 was dismissed in its entirety. The judgment records that the claimant's other complaints in claim number 3203852/2022 were not affected by this decision.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Struck out because the claimant had less than two years' service and therefore was not entitled to bring an unfair dismissal complaint under section 108 ERA 1996. | Struck out | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Struck out because the claimant's back injury and associated pain were found to cover a period of just under six months, with no further evidence that the impairment was long-term within section 6 and Schedule 1 Equality Act 2010. The judgment also states that claim number 3204308/2022 was dismissed in its entirety. | Struck out | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- section 108 Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 6 Equality Act 2010
- Schedule 1 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.