Case 3203977/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Wills v Ministry of Defence Police — 2023
- Case reference
- 3203977/2021
- Decision date
- 17 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shore Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Wills
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, in a judgment dated 17 July 2023, dealt with two disability discrimination claims brought by Mr A Wills against the Ministry of Defence Police. The claims were for discrimination arising from disability under section 15 of the Equality Act 2010 and for failure to make reasonable adjustments under sections 20 and 21 of the Equality Act 2010. Both claims were dismissed.
The stated reason for dismissal was procedural rather than substantive. The tribunal recorded that the claimant failed to pay the Deposit Order dated 17 March 2023, which had been sent to him on 20 March 2023. No remedy was awarded and no merits findings were recorded in the extracted text.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Claim under section 15 Equality Act 2010 dismissed because the claimant failed to pay the Deposit Order dated 17 March 2023, sent on 20 March 2023. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Claim for failure to make reasonable adjustments under sections 20 and 21 Equality Act 2010 dismissed because the claimant failed to pay the Deposit Order dated 17 March 2023, sent on 20 March 2023. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.