Case 3203995/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms A Dean v Hinduja Global Solutions UK Ltd and 1 other — 2022
- Case reference
- 3203995/2022
- Decision date
- 8 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge O’Brien Representation
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Ms A Dean
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 8 December 2022 at East London Hearing Centre before Employment Judge O'Brien, the Claimant appeared in person and the Respondents were represented by solicitors. The tribunal dismissed the Claimant's claims against the First Respondent, Hinduja Global Solutions UK Ltd.
The tribunal found that the Second Respondent, The UK Recruitment Co Limited, had made a deduction from the Claimant's wages for the week 11-15 April 2022. It ordered the Second Respondent to pay the Claimant £312.29 gross.
Any remaining claim by the Claimant against the Second Respondent was dismissed. No other remedy was recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that the Second Respondent made a deduction from the Claimant's wages for the week 11-15 April 2022 and ordered payment of £312.29 gross. The Claimant's claims against the First Respondent were dismissed. | Upheld | — | £312 |
| Working time regulations | Any remaining claim by the Claimant against the Second Respondent was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £312
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.