Case 3204049/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms S Gritton v London Underground Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 3204049/2022
- Decision date
- 27 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge B Beyzade Members
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
- Panel members
- Miss S Harwood, Mr S Woodhouse
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms S Gritton
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal unanimously found that the claimant was unfairly dismissed by London Underground Limited. It ordered compensation of £0.00, consisting of a £0.00 basic award and a £0.00 compensatory award.
The complaint of breach of contract and wrongful dismissal in respect of notice pay was found not well founded and dismissed.
The direct sex discrimination complaint and the discrimination arising from disability complaint were both dismissed as out of time. The tribunal found they were presented outside the time limit in s 123(1)(a) Equality Act 2010 and that it was not just and equitable to extend time under s 123(1)(b).
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant was unfairly dismissed, but awarded £0.00 compensation including £0.00 basic award and £0.00 compensatory award. | Upheld | — | £0 |
| Wrongful dismissal | The complaint of breach of contract and wrongful dismissal (notice pay) was found not well founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Sex discrimination | The direct sex discrimination complaint was dismissed because it was presented outside the time limit in s 123(1)(a) Equality Act 2010 and the tribunal found it was not just and equitable to extend time under s 123(1)(b). | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Disability discrimination | The discrimination arising from disability complaint was dismissed because it was presented outside the time limit in s 123(1)(a) Equality Act 2010 and the tribunal found it was not just and equitable to extend time under s 123(1)(b). | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £0
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £0
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £0
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
3 references- s 123(1)(a) Equality Act 2010
- s 123(1)(b) Equality Act 2010
- just and equitable to extend time
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.