Case 3204190/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms S Messi v Origin Multilingual and 2 others — 2023
- Case reference
- 3204190/2022
- Decision date
- 17 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Jones Representation
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
4 namedClaimant
Ms S Messi
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 11 May 2023, Employment Judge Jones dealt with the Claimant's case against the 2nd and 3rd Respondents, Infosys Limited and Ernst & Young LLP. The Claimant was in person. The respondents were represented. The judgment records that the claim was struck out against the 2nd and 3rd Respondents.
The tribunal said there were no reasonable prospects of success and that it had no jurisdiction to hear the claim against those respondents. The judgment does not set out a substantive merits determination of the underlying employment claims in this short decision.
The reasons were given in the hearing and are referred to in the case management orders. No monetary award is recorded in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment strikes out the claim against the 2nd and 3rd Respondents because there were no reasonable prospects of success and because the Tribunal had no jurisdiction to hear it. Full reasons were given orally and in the case management orders. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.