Case 3204656/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms T Frederick v Clarity Products Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 3204656/2021
- Decision date
- 29 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Taylor Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms T Frederick
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the London East Employment Tribunals on 30 June 2021. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge decided that the claim, or part of it, could properly be determined under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The tribunal recorded that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy. It found that she was entitled to a redundancy payment of £7,534.08, and cancelled the hearing listed for 2 December 2021.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Judgment states the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and is entitled to a redundancy payment of £7534.08 following a Rule 21 determination after no valid response was presented on time. | Upheld | — | £7,534 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,534
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 - Rule 21
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.