Case 3204710/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S Sasheva v All Techmart UK Limited and 1 other — 2021
- Case reference
- 3204710/2021
- Decision date
- 13 December 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Moor Representation
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Miss S Sasheva
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was dealt with under Rule 21 after no Response was received from either Respondent. Employment Judge Moor determined the claims on the information in the Grounds of Complaint at a telephone hearing on 9 December 2021.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harassment | The Tribunal found that both Respondents harassed the Claimant contrary to section 40(1)(a) Equality Act 2010, by unwanted conduct relating to sex under section 26(1) and by unwanted conduct of a sexual nature under section 26(2). | Upheld | Sex | — |
| Sex discrimination | The Tribunal found that both Respondents directly discriminated against the Claimant because of her sex contrary to section 39(2)(c) Equality Act 2010 by constructively dismissing her. | Upheld | Sex | — |
| Breach of contract | The Tribunal found that the First Respondent was in breach of contract by failing to give one week's notice of termination. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
5 references- Rule 21 Employment Tribunal Rules 2013
- section 40(1)(a) Equality Act 2010
- section 26(1) Equality Act 2010
- section 26(2) Equality Act 2010
- section 39(2)(c) Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 4 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.