Case 3204918/2021 · Employment Tribunal

Mrs Sharon Reeve v Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust — 2023

Case reference: 3204918/2021
Decision date: 28 May 2023
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Travers Representation
Venue: East London Hearing Centre

Indexed: 20 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mrs Sharon Reeve

Respondent

Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The tribunal recorded that the claimant's victimisation claim was dismissed following withdrawal at the hearing.

It also dismissed the claim in case number 3204918/2021 for arrears of pay so far as it concerned the period up to April 2020. The tribunal found that part of the claim had been presented out of time and that the statutory basis for extending time was not satisfied.

The written judgment contains no further findings, no written reasons beyond that oral reasons were given at the hearing, and no monetary award was made in this record of decision.

Claims and outcomes

2 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Victimisation	The judgment records that the victimisation claim was dismissed upon withdrawal at the hearing. No protected characteristic is identified in the extracted text.	Withdrawn	—	—
Unlawful deduction from wages	The judgment dismisses the arrears of pay claim only insofar as it relates to the period up to April 2020, on limitation grounds. The extracted text does not state the outcome for any later period.	Dismissed	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.