Case 3205177/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms M Barkat v Barts Health NHS Trust — 2024
- Case reference
- 3205177/2022
- Decision date
- 23 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Howden-Evans Members
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
- Panel members
- Ms A Berry, Ms M Legg
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms M Barkat
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningIn the unanimous judgment in case numbers 3205177/2022 and 3206033/2022, the Tribunal dismissed all complaints. The disability-related complaints of direct discrimination, failure to make reasonable adjustments, victimisation and harassment were held not to have been presented within the applicable time limit, and the Tribunal found it was not just and equitable to extend the time limit. The judgment therefore dismissed those claims on limitation grounds.
The complaints of direct discrimination on grounds of religion or belief and harassment related to religion or belief were found not well-founded and were dismissed. The judgment records no monetary award and no separate remedy findings.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Direct discrimination on grounds of disability; dismissed because the complaint was not presented within the applicable time limit and it was not just and equitable to extend time. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Other | Failure to make reasonable adjustments; dismissed because the complaint was not presented within the applicable time limit and it was not just and equitable to extend time. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Victimisation | Victimisation related to disability; dismissed because the complaint was not presented within the applicable time limit and it was not just and equitable to extend time. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Harassment | Harassment related to disability; dismissed because the complaint was not presented within the applicable time limit and it was not just and equitable to extend time. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Religion or belief discrimination | Direct discrimination on grounds of religion or belief; found not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | Religion or belief | — |
| Harassment | Harassment related to religion or belief; found not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.