Case 3205347/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v The Governing Body of Gascoigne Primary School and others — 2022
- Case reference
- 3205347/2021
- Decision date
- 14 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge B Elgot Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the preliminary hearing on 7 June 2022, Employment Judge B Elgot held that Ms Ijeomi Onyebalu was not, at the material time relevant to the consolidated claims, a disabled person within the meaning of section 6 Equality Act 2010. On that basis, the claimant's disability discrimination claims against all respondents in both cases did not succeed and were dismissed.
The judgment states that the disability discrimination claims included harassment. Those claims were disposed of at this hearing and did not proceed further. The judge recorded that the claimant's victimisation claims under section 27 Equality Act 2010 remained to be heard at a later hearing, together with a further case management preliminary hearing to deal with outstanding matters.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal held that the claimant was not, at the material time, a disabled person within section 6 Equality Act 2010, so the disability discrimination claims failed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Harassment | The harassment claim was dealt with together with the disability discrimination claims and was dismissed for the same reason. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.6 Equality Act 2010
- s.27 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.