Case 3205408/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Jon Wharnsby v Fire Brigades Union and 3 others — 2024
- Case reference
- 3205408/2022
- Decision date
- 14 November 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge B Beyzade Representation
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
5 namedClaimant
Mr Jon Wharnsby
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment concerned preliminary issues in consolidated proceedings. The claimant withdrew two amendment applications and also withdrew complaints of pregnancy or maternity discrimination, unjustifiable discipline, an Equality Act protected-act detriment issue, and the claim against Ross McLaren under case number 3205408/2022; those matters were dismissed under Rule 52.
The tribunal struck out the victimisation claim in case number 2307994/2023. It found that the complaint about Mr Lambe's email and attached Certification Officer documents was covered by judicial proceedings immunity, and that the claimant could not proceed in the employment tribunal with GDPR, DPA 2018, or ACAS Early Conciliation allegations relied on in that claim.
For case number 2303057/2024, the tribunal struck out the victimisation allegations relating to Mr Lambe, including matters arising from Mr Lambe's employment tribunal proceedings. It declined to strike out the aspect relating to Mr Shek because, taking the claimant's case at its highest on the limited information before it, the tribunal could not find that this part had no reasonable prospect of success.
Claims and outcomes
7 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | The pregnancy or maternity discrimination complaint was withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed under Rule 52. | Withdrawn | Pregnancy and maternity | — |
| Trade union | The unjustifiable discipline complaint under sections 64 and 65 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 was withdrawn and dismissed under Rule 52. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Victimisation | The issue alleging detriment on the ground that the claimant did a protected act under the Equality Act 2010 was withdrawn and dismissed under Rule 52. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Other | The claim against Ross McLaren under case number 3205408/2022 was withdrawn; the judgment does not identify the specific claim type in this passage. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Victimisation | The victimisation complaint in case number 2307994/2023, including allegations about Mr Lambe's email, ACAS Early Conciliation, GDPR and DPA 2018 matters, was struck out as having no reasonable prospect of success. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
11 references- Rule 37(1)(a) Tribunal Rules
- Rule 52 Tribunal Rules
- judicial proceedings immunity
- Lincoln v Daniels
- Tayside Public Transport Co Ltd v Reilly
- Balls v Downham Market High School & College
- Mbuisa v Cygnet Healthcare Ltd
- Mechkarov v Citibank NA
- section 27 Equality Act 2010
- section 18(7) Employment Tribunals Act 1996
- Parmar
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.