Case 3205799/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Diane Drew v Essex County Council and 2 others — 2024
- Case reference
- 3205799/2022
- Decision date
- 13 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Burgher Members
- Panel members
- Mr K Rose, Mr M Rowe
Parties
4 namedClaimant
Diane Drew
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant brought claims against Essex County Council, Paul Bailey and Jeff Wells. The case was heard at East London Hearing Centre by CVP on 10, 11 and 12 September 2024 before Regional Employment Judge Burgher with members Mr K Rose and Mr M Rowe.
The tribunal dismissed the claimant's claim for unfair constructive dismissal. It also dismissed the claims for harassment related to sex and direct sex discrimination. The judgment does not set out further reasons or any remedy award.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The judgment describes this as a claim for unfair constructive dismissal, which failed and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Harassment | The judgment describes this as harassment related to sex, which failed and was dismissed. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Sex discrimination | The judgment describes this as direct sex discrimination, which failed and was dismissed. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.