Case 3205815/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs A Mistry v Currys plc — 2023
- Case reference
- 3205815/2022
- Decision date
- 20 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge F Allen Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs A Mistry
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing, the Tribunal considered the claimant's claim for constructive unfair dismissal under s.94 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The Tribunal dismissed that claim because it did not have jurisdiction to hear it.
The reason given was that the claim was presented out of time, and the Tribunal found that it had been reasonably practicable for the claim to be presented in time. The claimant's remaining claim for a redundancy payment was not determined and was ordered to proceed.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The judgment describes this as a claim for constructive unfair dismissal under s.94 Employment Rights Act 1996 and dismisses it for lack of jurisdiction because it was presented out of time. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Redundancy | The redundancy payment claim was not adjudicated in this judgment; the judgment states that it will proceed. | Other | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.94 Employment Rights Act 1996
- reasonably practicable
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.