Case 3205939/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Stanislava Miteva v The Food Group Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 3205939/2021
- Decision date
- 25 July 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge John Crosfill
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Stanislava Miteva
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss Stanislava Miteva did not attend the final hearing at East London Hearing Centre on 25 July 2022. Employment Judge Crosfill recorded that claim numbers 3205939/2021, 3206099/2021 and 3205738/2021 were dismissed under rule 47 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunal (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
The judgment contains no substantive findings on the merits of the underlying claims and records no monetary award. It is a short dismissal decision issued by Employment Judge Crosfill sitting alone, with no appearance or representation for either side.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Claim number 3205939/2021 was dismissed under rule 47 after the claimant failed to attend the final hearing. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | Claim number 3206099/2021 was dismissed under rule 47 after the claimant failed to attend the final hearing. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | Claim number 3205738/2021 was dismissed under rule 47 after the claimant failed to attend the final hearing. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 47 of Schedule 1 to the Employment Tribunal (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.