Case 3205955/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Nowak Mr F Cantino v Becave Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 3205955/2022
- Decision date
- 9 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Representation Claimants
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Nowak Mr F Cantino
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe hearing took place on 9 June 2023 at East London Hearing Centre by CVP before Tribunal Judge Jack, acting as an Employment Judge. Neither Mr Nowak nor Mr Cantino attended, neither was represented, and the respondent did not appear. The tribunal recorded that neither claimant had filed documents or witness statements and that there had been no contact from either claimant to explain their absence.
The clerk confirmed that there had been no phone or email contact with the Tribunal, and the judge waited until 10:10 before proceeding. The reasons note that a judgment had recently been given on 3 June 2023 in case 3205521/2022, which appeared to involve very similar claims by Mr Nowak. The tribunal then struck out the claims under Rule 47, and the judgment states that all the claims in both 3205955/2022 and 3205956/2022 were dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The written reasons do not itemise the individual heads of claim. The tribunal struck out all claims under Rule 47 after neither claimant attended and no documents or witness statements were filed. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The written reasons do not itemise the individual heads of claim. The tribunal struck out all claims under Rule 47 after neither claimant attended and no documents or witness statements were filed. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The written reasons do not itemise the individual heads of claim. The tribunal struck out all claims under Rule 47 after neither claimant attended and no documents or witness statements were filed. | Struck out | — | — |
| Other | Mapped from the remaining case-listing category; the written reasons do not identify this head of claim separately. The tribunal struck out all claims under Rule 47 after neither claimant attended and no documents or witness statements were filed. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 47
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.