Case 3205969/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms N Jones v London Underground Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 3205969/2021
- Decision date
- 21 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Shore Members
- Panel members
- Ms J Land, Mr S Woodhouse
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms N Jones
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal dismissed the direct sex discrimination claim. It found that the Claimant's contractual position remained her 35-hour role on the Hainault roster, subject to local arrangements and voluntary syndicate swaps, and that the named male comparators were materially different because of their individual medical and working circumstances. It also found no evidence that a hypothetical male comparator in materially the same circumstances would have been treated differently.
The Tribunal dismissed the indirect sex discrimination claim. It found that the Respondent applied PCPs requiring train operators, including the Claimant, to work on Saturdays and to work a pattern of earlies, lates and alternate weekends, and accepted that those PCPs put women, and the Claimant, at a particular disadvantage because of childcare responsibilities. It held, however, that the PCPs were a proportionate means of achieving legitimate aims including efficient Central Line performance, adequate staffing, balancing workforce needs, and maintaining industrial relations and union-negotiated agreements.
The Tribunal dismissed the victimisation claim because it found no facts from which it could decide, in the absence of another explanation, that the alleged detriments were because of the Claimant's protected act on 10 June 2021. It also stated that, if the burden had shifted, it would have accepted the Respondent's explanations for the return-to-work arrangements, lack of immediate occupational health referral, and roster position.
The flexible working claim succeeded. The Tribunal found that the form completed on 15 April 2021 was a statutory flexible working application and that the Respondent did not deal with it in a reasonable manner, including by treating the matter as an appeal, misidentifying the earlier arrangements, and not arranging the discussion required by the ACAS Code after the statutory request. It made a declaration and awarded five weeks' capped gross pay, totalling £2,720.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex discrimination | Direct sex discrimination under s.13 Equality Act 2010 failed. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Sex discrimination | Indirect sex discrimination under s.19 Equality Act 2010 failed; two PCPs were found to put women and the Claimant at a particular disadvantage, but were held to be justified as a proportionate means of achieving legitimate aims. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Victimisation | Victimisation under s.27 Equality Act 2010 failed; the protected act relied on was a complaint of bullying and harassment on grounds of sex dated 10 June 2021. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Flexible working | The claim under ss.80G and 80H Employment Rights Act 1996 succeeded in respect of the flexible working application dated 15 April 2021. | Upheld | — | £2,720 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,720
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £2,720
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
20 references- s.13 Equality Act 2010
- s.19 Equality Act 2010
- s.27 Equality Act 2010
- s.136 Equality Act 2010 burden of proof
- s.23(1) Equality Act 2010 comparator test
- proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim
- s.80G(1)(a) Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.80H Employment Rights Act 1996
- ACAS Code of Practice 5 - Handling in a Reasonable Manner Requests to Work Flexibly
- Shamoon v Chief Constable of the Royal Ulster Constabulary
- IGEN Ltd v Wong
- Madarassay v Nomura International Plc
- Hewage v Grampian Health Board
- Bahl v Law Society
- Essop v Home Office
- Rutherford v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry
- Pike v Somerset Council
- Dobson v North Cumbria Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust
- Hampson v Department of Education for Science
- Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police v Homer
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.