Case 3206036/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Palmer v Mitie Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 3206036/2021
- Decision date
- 22 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Park Representation
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Palmer
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant brought a claim for unfair dismissal after resigning. He confirmed that he was not pursuing disability discrimination. The tribunal considered whether he had been constructively dismissed, focusing on whether the respondent had breached the implied term of mutual trust and confidence.
The tribunal found that a £60 wage deduction for a vehicle fine had been made in error, but was a genuine mistake and was rectified within a reasonable time, with an additional £25 paid to compensate for the error. It accepted that the claimant genuinely felt stressed by his workload, but found that the respondent, through his manager, had offered support, kept in regular contact, and provided or attempted to provide assistance.
The tribunal also found that the claimant's grievance was not treated as a formal grievance, but the issues he had raised were discussed and addressed, and that the respondent's managers responded appropriately when he reported chest pains on 19 July 2021. It concluded that the respondent had not acted in a way likely to destroy or seriously damage trust and confidence, so there was no fundamental breach of contract and the unfair dismissal claim was dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The claimant had resigned and needed to establish constructive dismissal as part of the unfair dismissal claim. The tribunal found no fundamental breach of contract, so the constructive dismissal argument failed and the unfair dismissal claim was dismissed. The claimant confirmed at the outset that he was not pursuing disability discrimination. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
5 references- Employment Rights Act 1996 sections 94-98
- section 94c Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 98(1) Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 98(4) Employment Rights Act 1996
- implied term of mutual trust and confidence
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.