Case 3206090/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss R Jain v Veolia ES (UK) Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 3206090/2021
- Decision date
- 10 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge B Beyzade Members
- Panel members
- Ms P Alford, Ms J Houzer
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss R Jain
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal recorded that the claimant withdrew her complaints of holiday pay and notice pay. Those complaints were dismissed under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure.
The Tribunal unanimously found that the claimant's complaints of unfair dismissal, including complaints brought under sections 103 and 103A of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and section 152 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992, were not well-founded and dismissed them.
The Tribunal also dismissed the complaints of direct race discrimination, harassment related to race, direct sex discrimination, harassment related to sex, unauthorised deductions from wages, and breach of contract in respect of commission and expenses payments, finding that those complaints were not well-founded.
Claims and outcomes
12 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The claimant's complaint of holiday pay was withdrawn and dismissed under Rule 52. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | The claimant's complaint of notice pay was withdrawn and dismissed under Rule 52. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The ordinary unfair dismissal complaint was not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The complaint of unfair dismissal pursuant to section 103 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 was not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | The complaint of unfair dismissal pursuant to section 103A of the Employment Rights Act 1996 was not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Trade union | The complaint of unfair dismissal pursuant to section 152 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 was not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Race discrimination | Direct race discrimination under section 13 of the Equality Act 2010 was not well-founded and dismissed. |
Legal tests applied
7 references- Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure
- section 103 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 103A of the Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 152 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- section 13 of the Equality Act 2010
- section 26 of the Equality Act 2010
- section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.