Case 3207241/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr B Baldovin v Rowan International Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 3207241/2021
- Decision date
- 23 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Allen JUDGMENT
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr B Baldovin
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr B Baldovin brought a complaint described as bullying and harassment against Rowan International Limited. The ET1 did not identify the protected characteristic relied on for an Equality Act claim, so the tribunal sought clarification from the claimant in correspondence after the case was issued.
The tribunal wrote on 13 December 2021 asking the claimant to reply with the protected characteristic relied on. After the claimant asked for an extension, the tribunal wrote again on 27 January 2022 apologising for issuing incomplete information and directing him to respond in writing by 10 February 2022 identifying the protected characteristic.
The claimant did not respond. The tribunal held that it had no jurisdiction to hear the claim for bullying and harassment and dismissed the claim. The hearing listed for 17 May 2022 was vacated.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harassment | The claimant brought a complaint of bullying and harassment, but did not identify the Equality Act protected characteristic relied on. The tribunal asked for clarification twice and the claimant did not respond, so the tribunal held it had no jurisdiction to hear the claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.