Case 3207367/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Llanos v Fairview Grocers Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 3207367/2021
- Decision date
- 5 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Yale Members
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
- Panel members
- Ms A Berry, Mr D Hurrell
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Llanos
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal upheld Mr M Llanos's unfair dismissal claim against Fairview Grocers Limited. It found that the claimant caused and contributed to his dismissal, and stated that both the basic and compensatory awards would be reduced by 60%. No remedy figure was fixed in the liability judgment, and a remedies hearing was to be listed if the parties did not otherwise resolve compensation.
The claimant's disability discrimination claims were dismissed. The tribunal dismissed the claim for direct disability discrimination, the claim for discrimination arising from a disability, and the claim for harassment related to a disability. The extracted judgment does not set out the detailed reasoning for those dismissals, only the outcomes.
The tribunal also found that the respondent made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages in relation to unpaid holiday pay. As with the unfair dismissal claim, the judgment records liability but leaves compensation to be determined later or resolved between the parties. The judgment was signed by Employment Judge Yale on 5 October 2023, with Ms A Berry and Mr D Hurrell sitting as members.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The claim succeeded. The tribunal also found that the claimant caused and contributed to his dismissal, so both the basic and compensatory awards were to be reduced by 60%. | Upheld | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The claim for direct disability discrimination was dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | The claim for discrimination arising from a disability was dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Harassment | The claim for harassment related to a disability was dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that the respondent made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages for unpaid holiday pay. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.