Case 3207431/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Rita Modza v London Borough of Tower Hamlets — 2021
- Case reference
- 3207431/2021
- Decision date
- 18 October 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Crossfill
- Venue
- East London ET
- Panel members
- Ms S Harwood, Mr S Woodhouse
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Rita Modza
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant brought complaints including failure to make reasonable adjustments, direct disability discrimination and victimisation. The judgment records that claims of race discrimination, harassment and discrimination arising from disability were dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant.
The tribunal dismissed the reasonable adjustment and direct disability discrimination complaints. It upheld one victimisation complaint, finding in favour of the claimant on the allegation that the respondent moved the claimant and her team because of the grievance submitted on 18 October 2021, while dismissing the other victimisation complaints.
The judgment ordered that the matter would be listed for a one-day remedy hearing. The truncated text provided does not contain any remedy award or monetary breakdown.
Claims and outcomes
7 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Failure to make reasonable adjustments claim dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Direct disability discrimination claim dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Victimisation | Victimisation claim upheld only in relation to whether the respondent moved the claimant and her team because of the grievance submitted on 18 October 2021. | Upheld | — | — |
| Victimisation | Other victimisation complaints were dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Race discrimination | Race discrimination claim dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | Race | — |
| Harassment | Harassment claim dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant; the protected characteristic is not clear from the truncated text. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
6 references- Equality Act 2010 s.13
- Equality Act 2010 s.15
- Equality Act 2010 ss.20-21
- Equality Act 2010 s.27
- Equality Act 2010 s.39
- Equality Act 2010 s.123(3)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.