Case 3212801/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Ali v London Underground Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 3212801/2020
- Decision date
- 19 April 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Barrowclough Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Ali
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard remotely by Cloud Video Platform before Employment Judge R Barrowclough on 16 April 2021. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by counsel.
The tribunal struck out the claimant's claim. It did so on the grounds that the manner in which the claimant had conducted the proceedings had been unreasonable and that the claimant had failed to comply with the tribunal's orders and directions.
The judgment records that the strike out was made pursuant to rule 37(1)(b) and (c) of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution & Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. No remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment identifies the claim via the listing category as unfair dismissal and records that the claim was struck out under rule 37(1)(b) and (c) because of unreasonable conduct of proceedings and failure to comply with orders and directions. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37(1)(b) and (c) of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution & Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.