Case 3212850/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms D Cheung v Clarity Products Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 3212850/2020
- Decision date
- 21 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Taylor
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms D Cheung
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningFollowing a Preliminary Hearing on 17 May 2021, the Tribunal summary sent to the parties on 19 May 2021 gave the respondent an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the response should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued.
The respondent failed to make written representations, failed to make sufficient representations, or failed to request a hearing. The response was therefore struck out. The Tribunal stated that the respondent would still be entitled to notice of hearings and decisions, but could participate in any hearing only to the extent permitted by the Employment Judge.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment struck out the respondent's response because it had not been actively pursued. It did not adjudicate the substantive claims or identify outcomes for the listed discrimination, unfair dismissal, or wages claims. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.