Case 3213074/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Arran Ronchetti v Meads Construction Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 3213074/2020
- Decision date
- 26 April 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tobin
- Venue
- East London Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Arran Ronchetti
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard remotely by Cloud Video Platform on 26 April 2021 before Employment Judge Tobin sitting alone at the East London Hearing Centre. Neither party attended or participated. The judgment records that the respondent was in liquidation and that the claimant had not complied with orders made by Employment Judge Lewis on 1 March 2021.
Because there was no attendance from either side, because the claimants in linked cases had lost contact with the claimant and did not know his contact details, and because the claimant had not complied with the earlier orders, the tribunal struck out the claimant's claims under Rules 37(1)(c) and 37(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. No merits findings or monetary remedy were recorded.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment does not restate the substantive head of claim; it states that the claimant's claims were struck out under Rules 37(1)(c) and 37(1)(d). The case listing identified breach of contract as one of the claim categories. | Struck out | — | — |
| Redundancy | The judgment does not restate the substantive head of claim; it states that the claimant's claims were struck out under Rules 37(1)(c) and 37(1)(d). The case listing identified redundancy pay as one of the claim categories. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment does not restate the substantive head of claim; it states that the claimant's claims were struck out under Rules 37(1)(c) and 37(1)(d). The case listing identified working time as one of the claim categories. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rules 37(1)(c) and 37(1)(d) Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.