Case 3220656/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Harris v Clarity Products Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 3220656/2020
- Decision date
- 21 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Taylor
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Harris
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningFollowing a preliminary hearing on 17 May 2021, the tribunal summary sent on 19 May 2021 gave the respondent an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the response should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued.
The respondent failed to make written representations, failed to make sufficient representations, or failed to request a hearing. The tribunal therefore struck out the response.
The judgment stated that the substantive claims of unfair dismissal, race discrimination, sex discrimination and unpaid wages would proceed to a hearing. The respondent remained entitled to notice of hearings and decisions, but participation in any hearing would be only to the extent permitted by the Employment Judge.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment struck out the response because it had not been actively pursued; it stated that the substantive unfair dismissal claim would proceed to a hearing and did not determine the claim. | Other | — | — |
| Race discrimination | The judgment struck out the response because it had not been actively pursued; it stated that the substantive race discrimination claim would proceed to a hearing and did not determine the claim. | Other | Race | — |
| Sex discrimination | The judgment struck out the response because it had not been actively pursued; it stated that the substantive sex discrimination claim would proceed to a hearing and did not determine the claim. | Other | Sex | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment struck out the response because it had not been actively pursued; it stated that the substantive unpaid wages claim would proceed to a hearing and did not determine the claim. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.