Case 3300014/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Telesford v Frimley Health NHS Foundation Trust — 2021
- Case reference
- 3300014/2020
- Decision date
- 22 June 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anstis
- Venue
- Reading
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Telesford
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Anstis, sitting alone, considered whether the tribunal had jurisdiction over the claims having regard to time limits. The judgment records that the claimant's age discrimination and disability discrimination claims, as described at the hearing, included matters after dismissal relating to an appeal hearing and the alleged late delivery of an appeal outcome, and that those matters were within the standard time limit.
The tribunal did not hear evidence from which it could conclude that particular allegations occurred or could be considered as continuing acts. It therefore considered whether any claim had no reasonable prospect of persuading a tribunal either that it formed part of a continuing act with matters brought in time, or that it would be just and equitable to extend time.
The only claim struck out was the age discrimination complaint about signing in using a publicly available red book and including a date of birth. The tribunal recorded that this dated from the start of employment, was more than a year apart from the other age discrimination allegation about placards at the appeal hearing, and appeared to be under the control of different people. The tribunal found no reasonable prospect of showing a continuing act or of obtaining a just and equitable extension of over a year.
All other complaints described in the case management order were recorded as proceeding to a final hearing. No remedy was awarded in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | The struck-out complaint was the age discrimination allegation that the claimant had to sign in at work in a publicly available red book and include his date of birth. Other claims were not determined in this judgment and were recorded as proceeding to a final hearing. | Struck out | Age | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- no reasonable prospect of success
- continuing acts
- just and equitable to extend time
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.