Case 3300055/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Hamani v Vision Security Group Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 3300055/2019
- Decision date
- 14 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Lewis Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Hamani
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment is a short disposal order. It records that the proceedings in case 3300055/2019 were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by Mr A Hamani. The respondent is identified as Vision Security Group Limited.
No merits findings are set out in the extracted text, and the judgment does not identify any substantive factual dispute, legal test, or remedy. The only recorded outcome is that the proceedings were dismissed after the claimant withdrew the claim.
The extracted text also does not specify the underlying complaint beyond the GOV.UK listing category supplied separately for this case. On the face of the judgment text alone, there is no award and no tribunal reasoning on liability.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The extracted judgment text does not state the underlying claim type; this classification follows the GOV.UK listing category. The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.