Case 3300117/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Gangadevi Chinegadoo v London Borough of Enfield — 2025
- Case reference
- 3300117/2025
- Decision date
- 31 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Taft REPRESENTATION
- Venue
- Cambridge
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Gangadevi Chinegadoo
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningGangadevi Chinegadoo brought a claim against London Borough of Enfield. The hearing was held by video at Cambridge Employment Tribunal on 16 October 2025 before Employment Judge Taft.
The tribunal struck out the unlawful deduction from wages claim under Employment Tribunal Rule 38(1)(a) on the basis that it had no reasonable prospect of success. No other substantive claims or remedies are recorded in the judgment.
The written record notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would only be provided if requested within 14 days. No monetary award was made because the claim was struck out.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Struck out under Employment Tribunal Rule 38(1)(a) because the tribunal found the claim had no reasonable prospect of success. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Employment Tribunal Rule 38(1)(a)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.