Loading page content.
TopEmployer file
Since 2017, London Borough of Enfield has appeared as a respondent in 5 employment tribunal cases, with £0 in total awards recorded against the employer.
| # | Claim type | Cases | Relative share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | Sex discrimination | 2 | |
| 02 | Unfair dismissal | 2 | |
| 03 | Breach of contract | 2 | |
| 04 | Working time regulations | 1 | |
| 05 | Unlawful deduction from wages | 1 | |
| 06 | Redundancy | 1 | |
| 07 | Race discrimination | 1 |
| Case ref. | Decided | Jurisdiction | Claimant | Claim types | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3321126/2019 | 26 April 2026 | England & Wales | Ms S McTernan | Sex discrimination, Unfair dismissal | — |
| 3300117/2025 | 31 October 2025 | England & Wales | Gangadevi Chinegadoo | Working time regulations | — |
| 3320605/2021 | 31 March 2022 | England & Wales | Mr R Furzer | Breach of contract, Redundancy, Unfair dismissal | — |
| 3334771/2018 | 10 March 2021 | England & Wales | Ms A Cobham-Wilson | Breach of contract, Race discrimination, Sex discrimination | — |
| 3332254/2018 | 2 December 2020 | England & Wales | Mr F Chagas v | Unlawful deduction from wages | — |
Data extracted from published employment tribunal judgments on gov.uk. Case reference, decision date, judge, venue and claim categories come from structured metadata. Claimant and respondent names are extracted from the judgment PDF text, and a second LLM-assisted pass adds per-claim outcomes, key findings, and any compensation awarded. Many UK tribunal decisions are liability-only — the remedy is set at a later hearing — so a case can correctly show an outcome with no award figure. See how the data is built.