Case 3300124/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs L Elmes v Gigaclear Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 3300124/2022
- Decision date
- 22 January 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hawksworth Appearances
- Venue
- Reading
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs L Elmes
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs L Elmes brought proceedings against Gigaclear Limited in the Reading Employment Tribunal. The matter was heard by CVP on 7 December 2023 before Employment Judge Hawksworth, with Mr M Dhilwayo appearing for the claimant and Mr W Downing for the respondent.
The written judgment records only that the respondent's application for strike out of the claimant's claim was refused. It does not set out any merits findings on the underlying claim, and it does not record any award or dismissal of the substantive complaint.
The decision note states that reasons were given orally at the hearing, so written reasons would not be provided unless requested by either party within 14 days. On the face of the written record, the only outcome is that the strike out application failed and the claimant's claim was allowed to continue.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The respondent's application for strike out of the claimant's claim was refused. The written judgment records only that procedural decision and does not determine the underlying substantive claim. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.