Case 3300392/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Z T Diamond v Kyra Enterprises Limited and 1 other — 2023
- Case reference
- 3300392/2023
- Decision date
- 13 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tynan Appearances
- Venue
- Cambridge
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Miss Z T Diamond
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Cambridge on 13 July 2023, Employment Judge Tynan recorded that the Claimant's claims against the Second Respondent, McDonald's Restaurants Limited, had no reasonable prospects of success. The judgment therefore struck out those claims. The extracted record does not set out the underlying causes of action in the reasons section, and no separate analysis of each claim type appears in the text provided.
The written record notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. No remedy, liability finding, or monetary award is recorded in the judgment text supplied.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment states that the Claimant's claims against the Second Respondent, McDonald's Restaurants Limited, had no reasonable prospects of success and were struck out. The extracted text does not specify the underlying legal heads. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.