Case 3300564/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Did not attend and was not represented. For the v Secretary of State for Business and 2 others — 2024
- Case reference
- 3300564/2024
- Decision date
- 11 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Postle Appearances
Parties
4 namedClaimant
Did not attend and was not represented. For the
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Norwich by CVP on 22 July 2024 before Employment Judge Postle. The claimant did not attend and was not represented. The respondents also did not attend, although written submissions were submitted on their behalf.
The judgment states that, upon the claimant not attending, the claimant's claims for redundancy pay, notice pay and holiday pay against the first respondent were dismissed under Rule 37D of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013 as no longer actively pursued. No liability findings or remedy assessment were made.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Dismissed under Rule 37D as no longer actively pursued when the claimant did not attend. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment refers to this as a claim for notice pay and dismisses it under Rule 37D as no longer actively pursued. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Dismissed under Rule 37D as no longer actively pursued when the claimant did not attend. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 37D of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.