Case 3300630/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Stephen O’Neil v Diligenta Limited and 1 other — 2022
- Case reference
- 3300630/2021
- Decision date
- 25 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tynan
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr Stephen O’Neil
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Cambridge by CVP on 2 August 2022, Employment Judge Tynan sat alone. The Claimant appeared in person, with counsel for each respondent.
The judgment records that the Claimant’s claims against the Second Respondent, Pearl Group Services Limited, were struck out on the ground that they had no reasonable prospects of success. No substantive findings on liability are set out in the written record for those claims.
The written record also states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the sending of the decision. No monetary remedy is recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment records that the Claimant’s claims against the Second Respondent were struck out because they had no reasonable prospects of success. The written record does not set out the substantive allegations. | Struck out | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.