Case 3300815/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs J Peake v AC Care Services Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 3300815/2022
- Decision date
- 4 February 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Foxwell
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs J Peake
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal stated that the claim was presented on 3 February 2022 and that the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. It therefore decided that a determination could properly be made under rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure.
On that basis, the tribunal found that AC Care Services Ltd had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages and ordered payment of £1,636.71 gross. It also found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £2,364.14 gross as damages.
The tribunal further found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £2,455.07. It also found that the respondent had failed to pay holiday entitlement and ordered £197.55 gross. The total monetary award recorded in the judgment is £6,653.47 gross.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered payment of £1,636.71 gross. | Upheld | — | £1,637 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £2,364.14 gross damages. | Upheld | — | £2,364 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to a redundancy payment of £2,455.07. | Upheld | — | £2,455 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay holiday entitlement and ordered £197.55 gross. | Upheld | — | £198 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,653
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 22 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.