Case 3301263/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Payne v Bristol Superlight Ltd and 1 other — 2022
- Case reference
- 3301263/2021
- Decision date
- 9 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anstis
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr G Payne
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a strike-out judgment under rule 37. The tribunal sent the claimant a letter dated 11 February 2022 giving him an opportunity to make written representations, or to request a hearing, explaining why the claim should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make representations in writing, did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Anstis ordered that the claim be struck out on 9 March 2022.
The extracted judgment does not identify the underlying substantive type of claim, and it records no remedy or award because the claim was struck out.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying substantive cause of action. It states only that the claim was struck out under rule 37 because it had not been actively pursued and the claimant did not make sufficient representations or request a hearing after the Tribunal's 11 February 2022 letter. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37
- not actively pursued
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.