Case 3301366/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss E Carroll v Midshires Care Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 3301366/2024
- Decision date
- 4 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Graham
- Venue
- Bury St Edmunds
- Panel members
- Mr R Allan, Mr S Holford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss E Carroll
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, chaired by Employment Judge Graham with Mr R Allan and Mr S Holford as members, heard the case on 10 and 11 February 2025 in person and on 12 and 13 February 2025 by video. It recorded that Miss E Carroll's complaints of automatic unfair dismissal and pregnancy and maternity discrimination did not succeed and were dismissed.
The written record does not set out the tribunal's reasons, but the outcome is clear: both substantive complaints were dismissed. The respondent's application for costs was also dismissed. No monetary award is recorded in the judgment text provided.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records this as a complaint of automatic unfair dismissal. Written reasons are not included in the public record provided here; the complaint was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | The judgment records a pregnancy and maternity discrimination complaint. Written reasons are not included in the public record provided here; the complaint was dismissed. | Dismissed | Pregnancy and maternity | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.