Case 3301540/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Lazzeri v Providence Bay Restaurants limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 3301540/2024
- Decision date
- 31 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Skehan REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Lazzeri
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal at Watford, sitting by CVP on 12 March 2025 before Employment Judge Skehan, upheld Mr Lazzeri's holiday pay complaint against Providence Bay Restaurants Ltd (in voluntary liquidation). The respondent did not attend. The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages by failing to pay the claimant for holidays accrued but not taken when his employment ended on 30 September 2023.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay Mr Lazzeri £712.50 within 14 days of the date the written judgment was sent to the parties. The claimant was recorded as being responsible for any tax or National Insurance due on that sum. The note to the decision states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons were not provided in the written record unless requested.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The judgment heads the complaint as Holiday Pay and states that the respondent made an unauthorised deduction from wages by failing to pay for holidays accrued but not taken when employment ended on 30 September 2023. | Upheld | — | £713 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £713
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.