Case 3301634/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Ndaruvuge v Ford Retail Limited T/A TrustFord — 2022
- Case reference
- 3301634/2020
- Decision date
- 22 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Quill
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Ndaruvuge
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 25 February 2022, the Tribunal gave Mr R Ndaruvuge an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out. The stated grounds were that he had not complied with the Tribunal's order of 8 September 2021 and that the claim had not been actively pursued.
Mr Ndaruvuge did not make written representations and did not request a hearing. Employment Judge Quill therefore ordered that the claim be struck out under rule 37.
The judgment does not determine the merits of the underlying race discrimination or unfair dismissal claims. It also records that the hearing listed for 10 to 14 October 2022 would not take place.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The judgment does not decide the merits of the race discrimination claim; it records that the claim was struck out under rule 37 for non-compliance and lack of active pursuit. | Struck out | Race | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment does not decide the merits of the unfair dismissal claim; it records that the claim was struck out under rule 37 for non-compliance and lack of active pursuit. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.