Case 3301680/2011 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P McCorkell, solicitor For the v Mr Jarallah Al Malki and 1 other — 2020
- Case reference
- 3301680/2011
- Decision date
- 6 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hyams
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr P McCorkell, solicitor For the
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that the claimant worked for the respondents as a live-in domestic servant from 19 January 2011 to 14 March 2011, working from about 6.00am until midnight each day, with no days off and no proper rest breaks. It accepted her evidence that she was not paid for this work, and awarded £4,763.96 in unpaid wages after allowing for the £1,000 previously paid by the respondents.
The tribunal also upheld the Working Time Regulations claims. It awarded £1,250 for failure to provide the claimant with the required daily breaks, and £630.50 for accrued holiday pay, recalculated by reference to an 18-hour working day over 55 days. It further found failures to provide a statement of particulars and itemised pay statements, and awarded £1,600 under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002, being four weeks' pay at the statutory cap then applicable.
The direct race discrimination, indirect race discrimination and harassment claims were dismissed. Applying Onu v Akwiwu and Mruke v Khan, the tribunal held that the claimant's treatment was because of her vulnerability arising from her socio-economic circumstances and immigration status, rather than because of race. The indirect discrimination claim also failed because the tribunal could not identify a provision, criterion or practice within section 19 of the Equality Act 2010.
Claims and outcomes
7 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Award for unpaid wages after deduction of the £1,000 already paid by the respondents. | Upheld | — | £4,764 |
| Working time regulations | Compensation for failure to permit the claimant to take the breaks required by regulations 10 and 12 of the Working Time Regulations 1998. | Upheld | — | £1,250 |
| Holiday pay | Accrued holiday pay recalculated by the tribunal using an 18-hour working day over 55 days. | Upheld | — | £631 |
| Other | Award under section 38 Employment Act 2002 for failure to provide a section 1 statement of particulars; the tribunal also found failures under sections 4 and 8 ERA 1996 but made no separate award for those matters. | Upheld | — | £1,600 |
| Race discrimination | Direct race discrimination claim under section 13 Equality Act 2010 was dismissed. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Race discrimination | Indirect race discrimination claim under section 19 Equality Act 2010 was dismissed. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Harassment | Harassment claim under section 26 Equality Act 2010 was dismissed. |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £8,244
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
6 references- Onu v Akwiwu [2016] UKSC 31
- Mruke v Khan [2018] EWCA Civ 280
- section 19 Equality Act 2010 provision, criterion or practice test
- section 26 Equality Act 2010
- section 38 Employment Act 2002
- regulations 10 and 12 Working Time Regulations 1998
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.