Case 3301706/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr B Gyedu v Accomplish Group — 2025
- Case reference
- 3301706/2024
- Decision date
- 6 August 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dick Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr B Gyedu
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing on 15 July 2025 before Employment Judge Dick, the tribunal struck out the complaint of unfair dismissal brought by Mr B Gyedu against Accomplish Group Limited. The reason given was that the unfair dismissal complaint had no reasonable prospect of success, and the strike-out was made under Employment Tribunal Rule 38(1)(a).
The judgment does not determine any remedy for the unfair dismissal complaint. It records that the remainder of the claim, as amended, may proceed, but it does not identify or decide any further claims in the text provided. No lay members are listed, and the written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Struck out under Employment Tribunal Rule 38(1)(a) because it had no reasonable prospect of success. The judgment states that the remainder of the amended claim may proceed. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Employment Tribunal Rule 38(1)(a)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.