Case 3301827/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Lee Beresford v British Airways plc — 2022
- Case reference
- 3301827/2020
- Decision date
- 10 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bedeau Members
- Venue
- Watford
- Panel members
- Mr A Scott, Mrs A Brosnan
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Lee Beresford
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard Mr Lee Beresford's claims against British Airways Plc at Watford from 8 to 10 August 2022, sitting with Employment Judge Bedeau and two members.
The judgment states that the claim of direct discrimination because of disability was not well-founded and was dismissed. It also states that the claim of harassment related to disability was not well-founded and was dismissed.
Reasons were given orally at the hearing. The written judgment does not set out further factual findings, legal reasoning, or any remedy award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harassment | The judgment records the claim as harassment related to disability and states it was not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment records the claim as direct discrimination because of disability and states it was not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.